| Summary Myotonic Dystrophy Type II |
|
|
| Health Issues - Myotonic dystrophy Type 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SummaryDisease characteristics. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is characterized by myotonia (90% of affected individuals) and muscle dysfunction (weakness, pain, and stiffness) (82%), and less commonly by cardiac conduction defects, iridescent posterior subcapsular cataracts, insulin insensitive type 2 diabetes mellitus, and testicular failure. Although myotonia (involuntary muscle contraction with delayed relaxation) has been reported during the first decade, onset is typically in the third decade, most commonly with fluctuating or episodic muscle pain that can be debilitating and weakness of the neck flexors and finger flexors. Subsequently, weakness occurs in the elbow extensors and the hip flexors and extensors. Facial weakness and weakness of the ankle dorsiflexors are less common. Myotonia rarely causes severe symptoms. Diagnosis/testing. CNBP(ZNF9) is the only gene known to be associated with myotonic dystrophy type 2. CNBP intron 1 contains a complex repeat motif, (TG)n(TCTG)n(CCTG)n. Expansion of the CCTG repeat causes DM2. The number of CCTG repeats in expanded alleles ranges from approximately 75 to more than 11,000, with a mean of approximately 5000 repeats. The detection rate of a CNBP CCTG expansion is more than 99% with the combination of routine PCR, Southern blot analysis, and the "PCR repeat assay." Management. Management includes ankle-foot orthoses, wheelchairs, or other assistive devices as needed for weakness, defibrillator placement for those with arrhythmias, removal of cataracts that impair vision, testosterone replacement therapy for hypogonadism in males, and avoidance of cholesterol-lowering medications when associated with increased weakness. Myotonia rarely requires treatment. Routine physical activity appears to help maintain muscle strength and endurance and to control musculoskeletal pain. Medications used with some success in pain management include mexilitene, gabapentin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), low-dose thyroid replacement, low-dose steroids (e.g., 5 mg prednisone on alternate days), and tricyclic antidepressants. Surveillance includes annual ECG to detect/monitor cardiac conduction defects, annual measurement of fasting serum glucose concentration and glycosylated hemoglobin level, and testing of males every few years for evidence of hypogonadism. Genetic counseling. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. To date, all individuals whose biological parents have been evaluated with molecular genetic testing have had one parent with a CNBP gene expansion; de novo mutations have not been reported. Each child of an individual with a CNBP gene expansion has a 50% chance of inheriting the expansion. Neither the size of a predominant allele nor the total number of different detectable expansions in a single sample can predict disease severity, age of onset, or clinical symptoms. Prenatal testing for pregnancies at 50% risk is possible when the presence of a CNBP expansion has been identified in the affected parent. DiagnosisClinical DiagnosisMyotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) should be suspected in individuals with the following:
TestingMuscle biopsy. Muscle pathology includes atrophic fibers, scattered severely atrophic fibers with pyknotic myonuclei, and marked proliferation of fibers with central nuclei [Day et al 1999; Day et al 2003; Schoser, Schneider-Gold et al 2004], all of which occur in both myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and DM2 and thus cannot be used to distinguish between them.
Molecular Genetic TestingGeneReviews designates a molecular genetic test as clinically available only if the test is listed in the GeneTests Laboratory Directory by at least one US CLIA-certified laboratory or a clinical laboratory outside the US. GeneTests does not independently verify information provided by laboratories and does not warrant any aspect of a laboratory's work. Listing in GeneTests does not imply that laboratories are in compliance with accreditation, licensure, or patent laws. Clinicians must communicate directly with the laboratories to verify information. —ED. Gene. CNBP(ZNF9), the gene encoding cellular nucleic acid-binding protein (zinc finger protein 9), is the only gene known to be associated with DM2. CNBP intron 1 contains a complex repeat motif, (TG)n(TCTG)n(CCTG)n. Expansion of the CCTG repeat causes DM2 [Liquori et al 2001]. Allele sizes
Clinical uses
Clinical testing Mutation analysis. The large size of the CCTG expansion and the presence of somatic heterogeneity complicate the detection of abnormal CNBP alleles. The detection rate of a CNBP CCTG expansion increases to more than 99% with use of a set of diagnostic tests that combines routine PCR, Southern blot analysis, and the "PCR repeat assay" [Day et al 2003].
Sequence analysis. Because of variability in size of the flanking TG and TCTG repeats and because of variability in the number of interruptions within the CCTG repeat tract, the number of CCTGs must be determined by sequence analysis. Although sequencing of some expanded alleles was necessary to demonstrate that only the CCTG portion of the complex repeat expands in affected individuals, sequencing to determine the specific CCTG repeat length is not useful for diagnostic purposes because most expansions are too long for the sequencing reactions. Table 1 summarizes molecular genetic testing for this disorder.
1. Proportion of affected individuals with a mutation(s) as classified by gene/locus, phenotype, population group, genetic mechanism, and/or test method Interpretation of test results
Testing StrategyIf PCR analysis shows a single band, indicating presence of only a single normal allele size, which occurs in 15% of normal individuals and in all affected individuals, it is necessary to perform both Southern blot analysis and the PCR repeat assay to determine if the individual is homozygous for the normal-sized allele or has both a normal-sized allele and an expanded allele that fails to amplify by PCR because of its large size [Liquori et al 2001]. Genetically Related (Allelic) DisordersNo other phenotype is known to be associated with mutations in CNBP. Clinical DescriptionNatural HistoryMyotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a multisystem disorder characterized by myotonia (90%) and muscle dysfunction (weakness, pain, and stiffness) (82%), as well as a consistent constellation of seemingly unrelated clinical features, including: cardiac conduction defects (19%), iridescent posterior subcapsular cataracts (36%-78%, increasing with age), and a specific set of endocrine changes including insulin insensitivity (25%-75%, increasing with age) and testicular failure (29%-65%). The onset of symptoms in individuals with DM2 is typically in the third decade, with the most common symptoms being muscle weakness and pain, although myotonia during the first decade has been reported [Day et al 1999, Day et al 2003]. Note that unlike myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), which can present in adulthood as a degenerative disorder or during infancy or childhood with variably severe congenital features, DM2 has not been associated with developmental abnormalities and thus does not cause severe childhood symptoms. The absence of developmental defects in any affected family members with DM2 is a reliable and clinically significant difference between the two forms of DM. Muscle dysfunction. Individuals with DM2 often come to medical attention because of muscle weakness, pain, and myotonia [Ricker et al 1994, Moxley 1996, Day et al 1999, Ricker 1999, Ricker et al 1999, Thornton 1999, Harper 2001, Day et al 2003]. The muscles affected in the earliest stages of the disease are the neck flexors and finger flexors. Subsequently, weakness is seen in the elbow extensors and the hip flexors and extensors. Thirty percent of individuals have hip-muscle weakness that develops after age 50 years. Facial weakness and weakness of the ankle dorsiflexors can also be present but are less common. Myotonia, i.e., involuntary muscle contraction and delayed relaxation caused by muscle hyperexcitablity, is present in almost all individuals with DM2 but only rarely causes severe symptoms. Fluctuating or episodic muscle pain is reported by a majority of affected individuals and can be debilitating. Multisystem features. Posterior subcapsular iridescent cataracts can be seen on slit lamp examination as early as the second decade of life. The reported age of cataract extraction ranges from 28 to 74 years [Day et al 2003]. Although cardiac involvement in individuals with DM2 appears more mild than in DM1 [Meola et al 2002], DM2 can be associated with atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction defects, arrhythmias, cardiomyopthy, and sudden death [Colleran et al 1997; Merino et al 1998; Nguyen et al 1988; Philips et al 1998; Day et al 2003; Schoser, Ricker et al 2004]. Anesthetic complications have not been reported in individuals with DM2, and probably occur less frequently than in DM1, where intraoperative and postoperative cardiac arrhythmias, ventilatory suppression, and poor airway protection are recognized causes of significant morbidity and mortality. Endocrine abnormalities described in individuals with DM2 include insulin-insensitive type 2 diabetes mellitus and testicular failure resulting in male infertility [Day et al 2003, Savkur et al 2004]. Individuals with DM2, like those with DM1, have a high incidence of hypogammablobulinemia, with lower than normal levels of both IgG and IgM, although no associated clinical problems have been observed. Central nervous system abnormalities reported in individuals with DM2 include white matter changes apparent on MRI and reduced cerebral blood flow in the frontal and temporal region apparent on PET scan [Hund et al 1997, Meola et al 1999]. These anatomical changes appear to have some effect on cognition, behavior, and personality, although unlike DM1, DM2 has not been associated with mental retardation [Meola et al 2002, Meola et al 2003]. Increased sleepiness has been reported in some individuals with DM2 [Day et al 1999], but no reports have rigorously compared or contrasted sleep issues in DM1 and DM2. In women with DM2, symptoms may worsen during pregnancy [Day et al 1999, Newman et al 1999 , Rudnik-Schoneborn et al 2006]. Polyhydramnios, a recognized feature of DM1, has not been reported in individuals with DM2. Genotype-Phenotype CorrelationsNo significant correlation exists between CCTG repeat size and age of onset of weakness or other measures of disease severity (e.g., age of cataract extraction). The observation that phenotypic features in individuals with CCTG repeat expansions in both CNBP alleles are as severe as those seen in their heterozygous sibs and parents further demonstrates that CCTG repeat number does not alter the clinical course [Schoser, Kress et al 2004]. A correlation exists between the repeat size and the age of the individual with DM2 at the time that the repeat size is measured, indicating that the repeat length increases with age [Schneider et al 2000, Liquori et al 2001, Day et al 2003]. PenetranceDisease penetrance reflects both a subject's sensitivity for his/her symptoms and a physician's ability to correctly identify and interpret signs of the disease. As affected families and their physicians become increasingly aware of the clinical features of DM2, penetrance approaches 100%. Examination by experienced investigators. In a study of 234 adults age 18 years or older examined by experienced investigators, all but one individual with a DM2 expansion were correctly classified as affected. (A 50-year-old male was misclassified as unaffected, possibly the result of an incomplete examination.) Family histories revealed the following:
AnticipationClinical features have been reported to worsen from generation to generation in families that participated in the original characterization of DM2 [Schneider et al 2000; Day et al 2003]. Data suggested that this was caused by anticipation (worsening of the disease on transmission) rather than bias of ascertainment (inadvertent inclusion of more severely affected younger-generation family members in the study). However, CNBP molecular genetic testing revealed no overt congenital form of DM2 comparable to the congenital form of DM1, which established the role of anticipation in that disease. Furthermore, the lack of correlation between disease severity and CCTG repeat length underscores the conclusion that intergenerational changes in repeat length would not be expected to reliably worsen disease severity, distinguishing DM2 inheritance from polyglutamine diseases in which increases of the CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion correlate with worsening disease manifestations. The lack of correlation between repeat length and disease severity is furthermore substantiated by the observation that individuals homozygous for repeat expansions have clinical disease indistinguishable from that of their heterozygous siblings [Schoser, Kress et al 2004]. NomenclatureThe International Myotonic Dystrophy Consortium (IDMC) and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) both recognize that DM2 and proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM) refer to the same condition. Individuals with PROMM were originally described as having some features of DM1 but without the characteristic DMPK trinucleotide repeat expansion. DM2 was originally thought to be clinically distinct from PROMM because of apparent differences in the clinical descriptions of families with PROMM and DM2. However, most families with PROMM have now been shown to have the characteristic CNBP expansion observed in individuals with DM2. Note: The term PROMM is still sometimes used to refer to the clinical phenotype if the causative mutation is unknown; however, when the diagnosis is established through molecular genetic testing of CNBP, the more precise term of DM2 is preferable. No other genetic causes of multisystem myotonic dystrophies have been confirmed, although their existence has been suggested. The International Myotonic Dystrophy Consortium has agreed that any newly identified multisystem myotonic dystrophies will be sequentially named as forms of myotonic dystrophy. One family posited to have DM3 [Le Ber et al 2004] has subsequently been shown to have an unusual presentation of Paget's disease with familial inclusion body myositis [Udd et al 2006], also known as inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFTD) and caused by mutations in VCP. PrevalenceMyotonic dystrophy is the most common adult form of muscular dystrophy, estimated to affect approximately one in 8000 in the general population. The proportions of myotonic dystrophy caused by DM1 and DM2 are unknown. Prevalence appears to differ in various populations; however, few definitive demographic studies have been performed. A higher prevalence of DM2 is observed in Germany and Poland and in individuals of German or Polish decent [Udd et al 2003]. DM2 has been reported in Afghanistan and Sri Lanka but not in China, Japan or Sub-Saharan Africa. Differential DiagnosisFor current information on availability of genetic testing for disorders included in this section, see GeneTests Laboratory Directory. —ED. Multisystem myotonic myopathies. The only definite causes of the myotonic dystrophy phenotype to date are either an untranslated CTG expansion at the 3' untranslated region in DMPK (myotonic dystrophy type 1, DM1) or a CCTG expansion in intron one of CNBP (DM2). Definitive diagnosis of these two forms of myotonic dystrophy relies on molecular genetic testing. Although routine clinical evaluation can reliably identify myotonic dystrophy, the true adult-onset forms of DM1 and DM2 cannot be reliably distinguished from each other using clinical criteria alone. The cataracts in individuals with DM1 and DM2 are indistinguishable. The most robust difference between DM1 and DM2 is that club feet, neonatal weakness and respiratory insufficiency, mental retardation, craniofacial abnormalities, and childhood hypotonia and weakness have been reported in individuals with DM1 but not those with DM2. In addition, or possibly because of the presence of these congenital effects, adults with DM1 often have more weakness and myotonia than adults with DM2; individuals with DM1 tend to have more pronounced facial and bulbar weakness, muscle atrophy, cardiac involvement, and central nervous system abnormalities including central hypersomnia [Meola et al 2002; Ranum & Day 2002, 2004; Day & Ranum 2005]. Previous reports of a multisystemic myotonic disorder that is not linked to the DM1 locus or the DM2 locus (i.e., "non-DM1, non-DM2 cases of PROMM") have been retracted after some family members were found to have a CNBP CCTG expansion, confirming the diagnosis of DM2 in those families [Day et al 2003]. Nonetheless, additional genetic causes of DM may exist. The family described as having a novel multisystemic myotonic disorder ("DM3") [Le Ber et al 2004] has some features in common with DM1 and DM2 (cataracts and myotonia) but also has distinctly different neurologic abnormalities (motor neuron disease and spongiform encephalopathy); although the phenotype in this family was initially thought to mirror myotonic dystrophy, the family has now been classified as having Paget's disease and familial inclusion body myositis caused by a VCP mutation [Udd et al 2006, Weihl et al 2006], a disorder pathophysiologically distinct from DM. Hereditary distal myopathy. The differential diagnosis for hereditary distal myopathies includes hereditary inclusion body myositis (IBM), hereditary myofibrillar myopathy (MFM), distal muscular dystrophy (e.g., Miyoshi (see Dysferlinopathy), Nonaka, Welander, Markesbery-Griggs, Udd), and some limb-girdle muscular dystrophies. Additionally, IBM and MFM may occur sporadically (see Table 2).
Myotonia. Electrical myotonia occurs in several conditions, but the presence of myotonia in multiple family members restricts diagnostic possibilities to either DM or to the nondystrophic myotonias, which are caused by mutations in chloride and sodium channel genes, resulting in myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita, and hyperkalemic periodic paralysis. Those conditions are not associated with the muscular dystrophy or multisystem features that typify DM1 and DM2 and can thus be distinguished on clinical grounds. Other. Occasionally, individuals with DM2 have been misdiagnosed as having atypical motor neuron disease [Rotondo et al 2005], inflammatory myopathy, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or metabolic myopathy. ManagementEvaluations Following Initial DiagnosisTo establish the extent of disease in an individual diagnosed with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2):
Treatment of ManifestationsA physiatrist, occupational therapist, or physical therapist can help determine the need for ankle-foot orthoses, wheelchairs, or other assistive devices as the disease progresses [Johnson et al 1995]. Routine physical activity appears to be beneficial for maintaining muscle strength and endurance in persons with DM2, and as an aid to control musculoskeletal pain. Myotonia is typically mild and rarely requires treatment [Ricker 1999], though use of mexilitene, which is very effective in controlling some forms of myotonia, has helped control muscle pain in some individuals with DM2. The effectiveness of medications and combination of medications in pain management varies. No one medication has been consistently effective; medications that have been used with some success include mexilitene, gabapentin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), low-dose thyroid replacement, low-dose steroids (e.g., 5 mg prednisone on alternate days), and tricyclic antidepressants. Low-dose narcotic analgesics, when used as part of a comprehensive pain management program, may help but may also lead to development of tolerance and escalating doses. Consultation with a cardiologist is strongly recommended for individuals with cardiac symptoms or ECG evidence of arrhythmia because fatal arrhythmias can occur prior to the onset of other symptoms. ECG, Holter monitoring, and an echocardiogram should be performed to evaluate syncope, palpitations, and other symptoms of potential cardiac origin. More advanced, invasive electrophysiologic testing of the heart may be required [Florek et al 1990, Hawley et al 1991]. The value of defibrillator placement is increasingly evident in individuals with DM2 who have overt arrhythmias, but the role of pacemaker/defibrillators in asymptomatic patients is yet to be determined [Schoser, Ricker et al 2004]. Cataracts can be removed if they impair vision. As compared to the more typical senile nuclear cataracts, direct ophthalmoscopy and even slit lamp examination can underestimate the functional significance of cataracts in individuals with DM2 because the alteration of vision depends on location, not just the number of subcapsular opacities. Testosterone replacement therapy can be beneficial in males with symptomatic hypogonadism. Direct gastrointestinal manifestations of DM2 are yet to be characterized, but some patients complain of postprandial abdominal pain, bloating, constipation, and diarrhea. As in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), some patients respond to prokinetic agents such as metochlopromide (ReglanTM) and tegaserod (ZelnormTM). Prevention of Primary ManifestationsNo specific treatment exists for the progressive weakness in individuals with DM2. Prevention of Secondary ComplicationsIncreased weakness in individuals with DM2 has been associated with both hypothyroidism and certain cholesterol-lowering medications, so that some strength can return if hypothyroidism is treated and statin-type cholesterol-lowering medications are eliminated. Note: Not all individuals with DM2 have an adverse response to statin medications, and thus diagnosis of DM2 is not an absolute contraindication to use of these drugs. SurveillanceAnnual ECG is indicated to detect asymptomatic and progressive cardiac conduction defects. Some centers perform annual 24-hour Holter monitoring even in the absence of cardiac symptoms. Fasting serum glucose concentration and glycosylated hemoglobin level should be measured annually. Males should be tested for hypogonadism if they become increasingly fatigued or have reduced sexual energy, and should be tested every few years even without symptoms to see if they would benefit from replacement therapy. Therapies Under InvestigationSearch ClinicalTrials.gov for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder. OtherGenetics clinics, staffed by genetics professionals, provide information for individuals and families regarding the natural history, treatment, mode of inheritance, and genetic risks to other family members as well as information about available consumer-oriented resources. See the GeneTests Clinic Directory. Support groups have been established for individuals and families to provide information, support, and contact with other affected individuals. The Resources section may include disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations. Genetic CounselingGenetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members. This section is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that individuals may face or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. To find a genetics or prenatal diagnosis clinic, see the GeneTests Clinic Directory. —ED. Mode of InheritanceMyotonic dystrophy type 2 is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Risk to Family MembersParents of a proband
Sibs of a proband
Offspring of a proband
Other family members. The risk to other family members depends upon the status of the proband's parents. If a parent is found to be affected, his or her family members are at risk. Related Genetic Counseling IssuesThere is no correlation between the measured repeat size and disease severity; thus, age of onset or clinical course cannot be predicted from molecular genetic test results. Somatic heterogeneity. The CNBP CCTG repeat expansion is highly unstable and tends to increase in size with age. The results of multiple tests performed on distinct peripheral blood samples may differ in expansion size. In addition, an individual may have more than one expanded allele size detectable by Southern blot analysis in a single sample of peripheral blood. Neither the size of a predominant allele nor the total number of different detectable expansions in a single sample can predict disease severity, age of onset, or clinical symptoms of the condition. Testing of at-risk asymptomatic adults. Testing of at-risk asymptomatic adults is possible using the same techniques described in Molecular Genetic Testing. Predictive testing can determine whether an individual has a CNBP expansion, and thus whether or not that individual is at risk of developing the disease. The repeat size cannot predict age of onset, severity, or clinical symptoms. An affected family member should be tested prior to offering testing to at-risk family members to confirm the presence of a CNBP expansion in the family. Predictive testing should be accompanied by genetic counseling to assure that individuals are aware of the limitations of the molecular genetic test and the possible risks associated with predictive testing. Testing of at-risk individuals during childhood. Testing of at-risk asymptomatic individuals during childhood is not recommended for adult-onset conditions in which there is no known effective treatment that prevents the disease or improves the outcome. Children who are symptomatic usually benefit from having a specific diagnosis established (see also the National Society of Genetic Counselors resolution on genetic testing of children and the American Society of Human Genetics and American College of Medical Genetics points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents). Family planning. The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal testing is before pregnancy. Similarly, decisions about testing to determine the genetic status of at-risk asymptomatic family members are best made before pregnancy. DNA banking. DNA banking is the storage of DNA (typically extracted from white blood cells) for possible future use. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, mutations, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA of affected individuals. See DNA Banking for a list of laboratories offering this service. Prenatal TestingPrenatal testing for pregnancies at 50% risk for DM2 is possible by analysis of DNA extracted from fetal cells obtained by amniocentesis usually performed at about 15-18 weeks' gestation or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at about ten to 12 weeks' gestation. To confirm the diagnosis of DM2, presence of a CNBP expansion must be identified in the affected parent prior to offering prenatal testing. Requests for prenatal testing of typically adult-onset conditions such as DM2 that do not affect intellect are not common. Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing, particularly if the testing is being considered for the purpose of pregnancy termination rather than early diagnosis. Although most centers would consider decisions about prenatal testing to be the choice of the parents, careful discussion of these issues is appropriate. Note: Gestational age is expressed as menstrual weeks calculated either from the first day of the last normal menstrual period or by ultrasound measurements. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may be available for families in which the disease-causing mutation has been identified in an affected family member. For laboratories offering PGD, see Molecular GeneticsInformation in the Molecular Genetics tables may differ from that in the text; tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
Data are compiled from the following standard references: Gene symbol from HUGO; chromosomal locus.
For a description of the genomic databases listed, click here. Molecular Genetic PathogenesisThe clinical and molecular parallels of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) strongly suggest that the untranslated RNAs that contain the repeat expansion are responsible for the pathologic features common to both disorders. The pathogenesis of both DM1 and DM2 can be explained by a gain-of-function RNA mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats, respectively, alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes [Tapscott & Thornton 2001; Ranum & Day 2002, 2004; Day & Ranum 2005]. Both DM1 and DM2 have RNA foci containing the repeat expansion that colocalize with several forms of the RNA-binding protein muscleblind (MBNL, MBLL, and MBXL) [Mankodi et al 2001, Fardaei et al 2002]. Dysregulation of muscleblind and of the RNA-binding protein CUG-BP subsequently alters gene splicing of various downstream genes. Increased CUG-BP RNA results in missplicing of cardiac troponin T (cTNT), the insulin receptor (IR), and the chloride channel, possibly contributing to the cardiac involvement, insulin insensitivity, and myotonia, respectively [Philips et al 1998, Mankodi et al 2001, Savkur et al 2001]. Downstream effects of abnormal insulin receptor splicing in both DM1 and DM2 correlate with the insulin insensitivity in both disorders [Savkur et al 2004]. Knockout of muscleblind in mice leads to the myotonia, cataracts, and myopathy characteristic of DM1 and DM2 [Kanadia et al 2003]. Normal allelic variants: The CNBP(ZNF9) CCTG repeat is part of a complex repeat motif with the overall configuration (TG)n(TCTG)n(CCTG)n. In normal CNBP alleles, the CCTG repeat contains interruptions similar to those seen in normal-length SCA1 and FMR1 alleles [Chung et al 1993, Kunst & Warren 1994]. The longest known normal CNBP allele, in which the overall repeat motif is 176 bp in length, includes 26 CCTG repeats with two interruptions [Liquori et al 2001]. Pathologic allelic variants: DM2 is caused by a single mutational mechanism: a CCTG tetranucleotide repeat expansion of more than 75 (overall repeat lengths greater than 372 bp). The expanded repeat length ranges from 372 bp to more than 44,000 bp (equivalent to a range of 75 to >11,000 repeats), although the actual pathogenic threshold has not been determined because the repeat tract is highly unstable and displays marked somatic heterogeneity; the affected individual with the smallest repeat expansion also has very large expansions, all of which may or may not be pathogenic. The CCTG repeat that is expanded in DM2 lies in intron 1 of CNBP and is transcribed into RNA but not translated into protein. Normal gene product: CNBP encodes cellular nucleic acid-binding protein [Pellizzoni et al 1997, Pellizzoni et al 1998]. The gene is widely expressed. CNBP shares no functional similarity to any genes at the DM1 locus, including the dystrophica myotonica-protein kinase (DMPK) gene, within the 3'-untranslated region of which the DM1 CTG expansion exists. Likewise, none of the genes in the DM2 region share similarity to genes in the DM1 region. The lack of similar genes at the two loci further indicates that the causative mutations result in pathogenic RNA expansions rather than alteration of gene expression or gene products. Abnormal gene product: The CCTG repeat that is expanded in DM2 is transcribed into RNA but is not translated into protein. There is no evidence of CNBP haploinsufficiency in DM2 [Margolis et al 2006]. ResourcesGeneReviews provides information about selected national organizations and resources for the benefit of the reader. GeneReviews is not responsible for information provided by other organizations. -ED. Myotonic Dystrophy: Making an Informed Choice About Genetic Testing National Library of Medicine Genetics Home Reference Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Muscular Dystrophy Campaign ReferencesMedical Genetic Searches: A specialized PubMed search designed for clinicians that is located on the PubMed Clinical Queries page. Published Statements and Policies Regarding Genetic TestingNo specific guidelines regarding genetic testing for this disorder have been developed.
Literature cited: See below hyperlink http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=gene∂=myotonic-d2 Suggested Readings Day JW, Ranum LP. Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2005; 5: 55–9. [PubMed] Harper PS, Johnson K. Myotonic dystrophy proximal myotonic myopathy and the type 2 myotonic dystrophy mutation: implications for our understanding of myotonic dystrophy. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, SLY WS, Valle D, Vogelstein B (eds) The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID), McGraw-Hill, New York, Suppl to Chap 217 www.ommbid.com . modified 2002 Ranum LP, Cooper TA. RNA-mediated neuromuscular disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006; 29: 259–77. [PubMed] Ranum LP, Day JW. Pathogenic RNA repeats: an expanding role in genetic disease. Trends Genet. 2004; 20: 506–12. [PubMed] Chapter NotesRevision History
TG, TCTG, and CCTG tracts, each of which is polymorphic in length, comprise the overall repeat at the DM2 locus.
Copyright © 1993–2008 All Rights Reserved University of Washington, Seattle
|






